R Newsroom ← All news
AI News

The Lakers Signed a 3-Point Shooter as Their Backup Big. Their Preseason Said Otherwise.

The Los Angeles Lakers gave up four first-round picks and signed Walker Kessler to a four-year, $130 million deal to solve their center problem. Then Kessler sat out the first two preseason games, and the problem came right back.

With Kessler unavailable, the Lakers started Kevon Looney against Sacramento and Sandro Mamukelashvili against Golden State. They lost the rebounding battle in both games. They lost the points-in-the-paint battle in both games. Two opponents, two different backup bigs, same result.

That's the part the Kessler hype cycle has mostly glossed over. The Lakers built their frontcourt around one player — and the moment he sits, the floor falls out.

What's not in dispute: Mamukelashvili, 27, is locked into the rotation. He signed a four-year, $52 million deal after leaving Toronto, where he shot 38.9 percent from three last season across 80 games — a career high in appearances. He is a legitimate floor spacer and, at 6-foot-9, physically capable of sliding to center.

What is in dispute: whether any of that actually makes him the right answer behind Kessler, or whether the Lakers need to be on the phone looking for something more traditional before opening night.

On one side, the case for Mamukelashvili is real. Kessler does not stretch the floor, so putting a near-39-percent three-point shooter next to him creates spacing Luka Doncic can exploit. According to one analysis, Mamukelashvili ranked in the 83rd percentile in catch-and-shoot three-point efficiency last season, and in the 85th percentile in rim shot-making. He can play power forward or center depending on the matchup, which gives head coach JJ Redick flexibility a pure bruiser would not. His $52 million commitment also signals the front office already made its call — they paid for this.

On the other, the preseason exposed something that numbers cannot paper over. Mamukelashvili's strengths are not in rebounding or interior scoring — precisely the two areas where the Lakers bled without Kessler. One report noted he ranked in just the 14th percentile in perimeter isolation defense and the 43rd percentile in rim protection. Names like Jericho Sims and Daniel Gafford have surfaced as trade targets, with Sims carrying only a $2.8 million salary that would be easy to absorb. The Lakers currently carry 16 guaranteed contracts — one over the regular-season maximum — and team president Rob Pelinka has acknowledged a consolidation trade is possible before opening night. There is room to move. The question is whether the front office has the appetite to admit the backup center spot needs a different kind of player entirely.

Which leaves the question nobody in the building has cleanly answered yet:

Is Sandro Mamukelashvili's shooting and versatility exactly what a Kessler-anchored frontcourt needs — or is he a $52 million workaround for a problem that only a traditional big man can actually fix?

The whole field is split on it. We dropped the question into the Arena and let the models argue it out. Watch below.

The debate

Should the Los Angeles Lakers trade for a traditional big man rather than rely on Sandro Mamukelashvili as Walker Kessler's backup center?

Listen to the full debate ►
Claude
The Lakers are making a significant mistake by treating Sandro Mamukelashvili as a viable backup center — a stretch forward moonlighting in the pivot is not a sustainable solution for a team with championship aspirations. Rim protection, interior rebounding, and post presence are not optional luxuries in the modern NBA; they are the foundation that allows everything else to function, and one injury to Walker Kessler exposes Los Angeles as dangerously thin down the stretch. 🏀 The Western Conference is loaded with physical, paint-dominant teams that will exploit this weakness methodically, and the Lakers cannot afford to gamble their playoff viability on a patchwork solution. Trading for a true big man isn't just preferable — it's necessary.
Gemini
While the opposition dismisses Sandro Mamukelashvili as merely a stretch forward moonlighting in the pivot, this narrow view ignores how Coach JJ Redick intends to utilize his unique playmaking and spacing to modernize the Lakers' frontcourt rotation.
Claude
Redick's optimism about Mamukelashvili is admirable, but a coach believing in a player's versatility doesn't change his physical limitations against true NBA centers. The question isn't whether "Mamu" can space the floor or facilitate — it's whether he can body up Nikola Jokic, Anthony Davis's opposite number, or Karl-Anthony Towns when Kessler is unavailable, and the honest answer is no. Modernizing a frontcourt rotation is a legitimate goal, but not at the cost of basic interior durability against playoff-caliber opponents. 💪 The Lakers gave up unprotected first-rounders in 2031 and 2033 to acquire Kessler precisely because interior presence matters — so why accept a glaring gap the moment he sits?
Gemini
While the opposition worries about Mamukelashvili matching up physically against elite centers like Jokic during Kessler's bench minutes, this concern overlooks the fact that no backup traditional big can truly stop MVP-caliber players anyway. Instead of wasting further trade assets on a redundant, paint-bound center, the Lakers benefit more from Mamukelashvili’s ability to stretch the floor and facilitate, offering a dynamic change of pace that keeps opposing defenses off balance. Furthermore, relying on his cost-effective four-year contract preserves the roster flexibility needed to pursue elite talent rather than