R Newsroom ← All news
AI News

The Lakers Signed a 3-Point Shooter as Their Backup Big. Their Preseason Said Otherwise.

The Los Angeles Lakers gave up four first-round picks and signed Walker Kessler to a four-year, $130 million deal to solve their center problem. Then Kessler sat out the first two preseason games, and the problem came right back.

With Kessler unavailable, the Lakers started Kevon Looney against Sacramento and Sandro Mamukelashvili against Golden State. They lost the rebounding battle in both games. They lost the points-in-the-paint battle in both games. Two opponents, two different backup bigs, same result.

That's the part the Kessler hype cycle has mostly glossed over. The Lakers built their frontcourt around one player — and the moment he sits, the floor falls out.

What's not in dispute: Mamukelashvili, 27, is locked into the rotation. He signed a four-year, $52 million deal after leaving Toronto, where he shot 38.9 percent from three last season across 80 games — a career high in appearances. He is a legitimate floor spacer and, at 6-foot-9, physically capable of sliding to center.

What is in dispute: whether any of that actually makes him the right answer behind Kessler, or whether the Lakers need to be on the phone looking for something more traditional before opening night.

On one side, the case for Mamukelashvili is real. Kessler does not stretch the floor, so putting a near-39-percent three-point shooter next to him creates spacing Luka Doncic can exploit. According to one analysis, Mamukelashvili ranked in the 83rd percentile in catch-and-shoot three-point efficiency last season, and in the 85th percentile in rim shot-making. He can play power forward or center depending on the matchup, which gives head coach JJ Redick flexibility a pure bruiser would not. His $52 million commitment also signals the front office already made its call — they paid for this.

On the other, the preseason exposed something that numbers cannot paper over. Mamukelashvili's strengths are not in rebounding or interior scoring — precisely the two areas where the Lakers bled without Kessler. One report noted he ranked in just the 14th percentile in perimeter isolation defense and the 43rd percentile in rim protection. Names like Jericho Sims and Daniel Gafford have surfaced as trade targets, with Sims carrying only a $2.8 million salary that would be easy to absorb. The Lakers currently carry 16 guaranteed contracts — one over the regular-season maximum — and team president Rob Pelinka has acknowledged a consolidation trade is possible before opening night. There is room to move. The question is whether the front office has the appetite to admit the backup center spot needs a different kind of player entirely.

Which leaves the question nobody in the building has cleanly answered yet:

Is Sandro Mamukelashvili's shooting and versatility exactly what a Kessler-anchored frontcourt needs — or is he a $52 million workaround for a problem that only a traditional big man can actually fix?

The whole field is split on it. We dropped the question into the Arena and let the models argue it out. Watch below.

The debate

Should the Los Angeles Lakers trade for a traditional big man rather than rely on Sandro Mamukelashvili as Walker Kessler's backup center?

Listen to the full debate ►
Claude
The Los Angeles Lakers cannot afford to enter a playoff race with Sandro Mamukelashvili — a developmental wing-center hybrid — as their primary insurance behind Walker Kessler at the five. A championship-contending roster demands proven rim protection, rebounding, and post presence as genuine depth, not a stopgap solution that forces the coaching staff to improvise when Kessler inevitably faces foul trouble or injury. The margin for error in the Western Conference is simply too thin to gamble on inexperience at the most physically demanding position on the floor. 🎯
Gemini
While a traditional post presence sounds reliable on paper, demanding another redundant rim protector ignores how Sandro Mamukelashvili's unique perimeter skillset actually complements Walker Kessler's elite interior defense. In the modern NBA, Mamukelashvili provides vital inside-out versatility and floor spacing that traditional centers simply cannot offer, preventing the offense from stalling when Kessler rests. Furthermore, with Kevon Looney already available to absorb heavy physical matchups under the rim, trading away valuable assets for another redundant big man would be a short-sighted waste of resources. 🏀
Claude
Looney as the safety valve actually undermines your argument — if the Lakers are already relying on a veteran backup to absorb "heavy physical matchups," then Mamukelashvili isn't really solving the depth problem, he's just adding a third option who can't anchor a unit when both Kessler and Looney are unavailable. The floor spacing argument only holds if Mamukelashvili can reliably guard opposing centers, and a developmental player with limited NBA track record is a significant liability in playoff-intensity minutes. 🔍 You keep praising his versatility, but the Western Conference features genuine bruisers at the five who will expose exactly the size and strength limitations that make "wing-center hybrids" compelling in theory and fragile in practice.
Gemini
Dismissing Mamukelashvili because he cannot solo-anchor against elite physical bruisers ignores that the Lakers already possess Walker Kessler and Kevon Looney to handle those heavy defensive assignments. By keeping Mamukelashvili, the coaching staff gains a crucial tactical change of pace that can drag those very same slow-footed opposing bigs out to the perimeter. Trading precious assets for a redundant traditional center would only strip the roster of flexibility, leaving the team fatally vulnerable to dynamic, wing-heavy playoff offenses. 🔄